PartDesign: modernize type checking
This commit is contained in:
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ bool Body::isMemberOfMultiTransform(const App::DocumentObject* obj)
|
||||
// to auto set it when the originals are not null. See:
|
||||
// App::DocumentObjectExecReturn *Transformed::execute(void)
|
||||
//
|
||||
return (obj->getTypeId().isDerivedFrom(PartDesign::Transformed::getClassTypeId()) &&
|
||||
return (obj->isDerivedFrom<PartDesign::Transformed>() &&
|
||||
static_cast<const PartDesign::Transformed*>(obj)->Originals.getValues().empty());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ bool Body::isSolidFeature(const App::DocumentObject *obj)
|
||||
if (!obj)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (obj->getTypeId().isDerivedFrom(PartDesign::Feature::getClassTypeId()) &&
|
||||
if (obj->isDerivedFrom<PartDesign::Feature>() &&
|
||||
!PartDesign::Feature::isDatum(obj)) {
|
||||
// Transformed Features inside a MultiTransform are not solid features
|
||||
return !isMemberOfMultiTransform(obj);
|
||||
@@ -212,15 +212,15 @@ bool Body::isAllowed(const App::DocumentObject *obj)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: Should we introduce a PartDesign::FeaturePython class? This should then also return true for isSolidFeature()
|
||||
return (obj->getTypeId().isDerivedFrom(PartDesign::Feature::getClassTypeId()) ||
|
||||
obj->getTypeId().isDerivedFrom(Part::Datum::getClassTypeId()) ||
|
||||
return (obj->isDerivedFrom<PartDesign::Feature>() ||
|
||||
obj->isDerivedFrom<Part::Datum>() ||
|
||||
// TODO Shouldn't we replace it with Sketcher::SketchObject? (2015-08-13, Fat-Zer)
|
||||
obj->getTypeId().isDerivedFrom(Part::Part2DObject::getClassTypeId()) ||
|
||||
obj->getTypeId().isDerivedFrom(PartDesign::ShapeBinder::getClassTypeId()) ||
|
||||
obj->getTypeId().isDerivedFrom(PartDesign::SubShapeBinder::getClassTypeId())
|
||||
obj->isDerivedFrom<Part::Part2DObject>() ||
|
||||
obj->isDerivedFrom<PartDesign::ShapeBinder>() ||
|
||||
obj->isDerivedFrom<PartDesign::SubShapeBinder>()
|
||||
// TODO Why this lines was here? why should we allow anything of those? (2015-08-13, Fat-Zer)
|
||||
//obj->getTypeId().isDerivedFrom(Part::FeaturePython::getClassTypeId()) // trouble with this line on Windows!? Linker fails to find getClassTypeId() of the Part::FeaturePython...
|
||||
//obj->getTypeId().isDerivedFrom(Part::Feature::getClassTypeId())
|
||||
//obj->isDerivedFrom<Part::FeaturePython>() // trouble with this line on Windows!? Linker fails to find getClassTypeId() of the Part::FeaturePython...
|
||||
//obj->isDerivedFrom<Part::Feature>()
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user