kindred/create
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues 37 Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 9 Releases 2 Wiki Activity

Fix various typos (#20651)

Browse Source 
* Fix various typos
Found via `codespell -q 3 -L aci,addmin,ake,aline,alle,alledges,alocation,als,ang,anid,anormal,anull,aply,apoints,ba,beginn,behaviour,bloaded,bottome,brushin,bu,byteorder,calculater,cancelled,cancelling,cas,cascade,centimetre,childrens,childs,colour,colours,commen,connexion,currenty,documentin,dof,doubleclick,dum,eiter,elemente,ende,feld,finde,findf,findn,fle,freez,graphin,groupe,hist,iff,incrementin,indexin,indicies,initialisation,initialise,initialised,initialises,initialisiert,inout,ist,itsel,kilometre,leadin,localy,lod,mantatory,matc,methode,metres,millimetre,modell,nd,noe,normale,normaly,nto,numer,oce,oder,ontop,orgin,orginx,orginy,ot,pard,parm,parms,pres,programm,que,rady,recurrance,renderin,re-use,re-used,re-using,rin,ro,rougly,sectionin,seperator,sergent,serie,shs,sinc,siz,som,stpo,strack,substraction,te,technic,thist,thru,tread,tru,ue,uint,unter,uupper,uptodate,vas,vertexes,vew,wallthickness,whitespaces -S "./.git,*.po,*.ts,*.pdf,./ChangeLog.txt,./src/3rdParty,./src/Mod/Assembly/App/opendcm,./src/CXX,./src/zipios++,./src/Base/swig*,./src/Mod/Robot/App/kdl_cp,./src/Mod/Import/App/SCL,./src/WindowsInstaller,./src/Doc/FreeCAD.uml,./src/Base/StackWalker.cpp,./build/doc/SourceDoc,./tools/build/WindowsInstaller/lang,./src/Mod/TechDraw/Templates/locale"`

* [pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks

for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci

---------

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
luzpaz
2025-04-05 23:58:20 -04:00
committed by GitHub
parent 0b3dca895d
commit 7a12d2f96f
11 changed files with 43 additions and 43 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
tests/src/Mod/Part/App/PartFeature.cpp
View File

@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ TEST_F(FeaturePartTest, create)
// without modifications
EXPECT_STREQ(_doc->getObjectName(featureNoDoc), "Vertex");
// The feature is created in otherDoc, which doesn't have other features and thertherefor the
// The feature is created in otherDoc, which doesn't have other features and thertherefore the
// feature's name will be assigned without modifications
EXPECT_STREQ(otherDoc->getObjectName(feature), "Vertex");

44
tests/src/Mod/Part/App/WireJoiner.cpp
View File

@@ -92,19 +92,19 @@ TEST_F(WireJoinerTest, addShape)
wjTS.addShape(wireTS);
wjTS.Build();
// The wire in wjTS is open, therefor to see the effect of wjTS.addShape() we must call
// The wire in wjTS is open, therefore to see the effect of wjTS.addShape() we must call
// wjTS.getOpenWires() and put the result in wireTS
wjTS.getOpenWires(wireTS, nullptr, false);
wjvTS.addShape({edge1TS, edge2TS});
wjvTS.Build();
// The wire in wjvTS is open, therefor to see the effect of wjvTS.addShape() we must call
// The wire in wjvTS is open, therefore to see the effect of wjvTS.addShape() we must call
// wjvTS.getOpenWires() and put the result in wirevTS
wjvTS.getOpenWires(wirevTS, nullptr, false);
wjvTDS.addShape(edges);
wjvTDS.Build();
// The wire in wjvTDS is closed, therefor to see the effect of wjvTDS.addShape() we can smply
// The wire in wjvTDS is closed, therefore to see the effect of wjvTDS.addShape() we can simply
// call wjvTDS.Shape() to replace the shape in wirevTDS
wirevTDS.setShape(wjvTDS.Shape());
@@ -452,12 +452,12 @@ TEST_F(WireJoinerTest, setMergeEdges)
EXPECT_FALSE(wjNoBuild.IsDone());
// In this case the number of edges is equal to 9 because all the 3 edges intersect the other 2
// and are therefor split in 3 edges each.
// and are therefore split in 3 edges each.
EXPECT_EQ(wireNoMergeEdges.getSubTopoShapes(TopAbs_EDGE).size(), 9);
// In this case the number of edges is equal to 6 because, among the 9 produced by
// WireJoiner::WireJoinerP::splitEdges(), 3 of them are connected to more than one other edge
// and therefor aren't added by WireJoiner::WireJoinerP::findSuperEdges()
// and therefore aren't added by WireJoiner::WireJoinerP::findSuperEdges()
EXPECT_EQ(wireMergeEdges.getSubTopoShapes(TopAbs_EDGE).size(), 6);
}
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ TEST_F(WireJoinerTest, setTolerance)
// WireJoiner::getOpenWires() to get the edges, if any, that aren't used to create a closed wire
wjNegtol.addShape(edgesNegtol);
// Setting tol to a negative value won't have effect and therefor wjNegtol.pimpl->myTol will
// Setting tol to a negative value won't have effect and therefore wjNegtol.pimpl->myTol will
// keep the default value.
// It's better also to give a negative value for the argument atol otherwise setTolerance()
// will set it to 0.0
@@ -541,17 +541,17 @@ TEST_F(WireJoinerTest, setTolerance)
wjtol.getOpenWires(wiretol, nullptr, false);
wjNegatol.addShape(edgesNegatol);
// Setting atol to a negative value won't have effect and therefor wjNegatol.pimpl->myAngularTol
// will keep the default value.
// The tol value must be given in any case.
// Setting atol to a negative value won't have effect and therefore
// wjNegatol.pimpl->myAngularTol will keep the default value. The tol value must be given in any
// case.
wjNegatol.setTolerance(-0.1, -pi);
wjNegatol.Build();
wjNegatol.getOpenWires(wireNegatol, nullptr, false);
wjatol.addShape(edgesatol);
// Setting atol to a negative value won't have effect and therefor wjNegatol.pimpl->myAngularTol
// will keep the default value.
// We give also the tol value so that a closed wire can be created.
// Setting atol to a negative value won't have effect and therefore
// wjNegatol.pimpl->myAngularTol will keep the default value. We give also the tol value so that
// a closed wire can be created.
wjatol.setTolerance(0.2, pi / 9);
wjatol.Build();
wjatol.getOpenWires(wireatol, nullptr, false);
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ TEST_F(WireJoinerTest, setTolerance)
// In this case, as the gap between edge1 and edge3 is smaller than tol, a closed wire can be
// created and it contains all the edges added with wjtol.addShape().
EXPECT_EQ(TopoShape(wjtol.Shape()).getSubTopoShapes(TopAbs_EDGE).size(), 3);
// There are no open wires and therefor no edges that create them
// There are no open wires and therefore no edges that create them
EXPECT_EQ(wiretol.getSubTopoShapes(TopAbs_EDGE).size(), 0);
// In this case, as there's a gap between edge2, edge4 and edge5, no closed wires are created.
@@ -580,12 +580,12 @@ TEST_F(WireJoinerTest, setTolerance)
// In this case, as the gap between edge2, edge4 and edge5 is smaller than tol, a closed wire
// can be created.
// Because of atol, edge4 and edge5 are considerated as duplicates and therefor one of them is
// Because of atol, edge4 and edge5 are considerated as duplicates and therefore one of them is
// removed by WireJoiner::WireJoinerP::add().
// The closed wire is then created using all the edges added with wjatol.addShape() except the
// removed one
EXPECT_EQ(TopoShape(wjatol.Shape()).getSubTopoShapes(TopAbs_EDGE).size(), 3);
// There are no open wires and therefor no edges that create them
// There are no open wires and therefore no edges that create them
EXPECT_EQ(wireatol.getSubTopoShapes(TopAbs_EDGE).size(), 0);
}
@@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ TEST_F(WireJoinerTest, getOpenWires)
// Assert
// All the edges added with wjNoOpenWires.addShape() are used to create a closed wire, therefor
// All the edges added with wjNoOpenWires.addShape() are used to create a closed wire, therefore
// wireNoOpenWires should be null
EXPECT_TRUE(wireNoOpenWires.isNull());
@@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ TEST_F(WireJoinerTest, getOpenWires)
// except those ones that are split, and all the edges generated by splitting an edge with
// another one.
// edge1 and edge2 are left untouched, while edge4 is split in two at the intersection point
// (1.0, 1.0, 0.0), therefor 4 edges.
// (1.0, 1.0, 0.0), therefore 4 edges.
EXPECT_EQ(wireOriginal.getSubTopoShapes(TopAbs_EDGE).size(), 4);
// In this case wireNoOriginal should contain only the edges generated by splitting one of them
@@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ TEST_F(WireJoinerTest, getResultWires)
// Assert
// All the edges added with wjNoResultWires.addShape() can't create a closed wire, therefor
// All the edges added with wjNoResultWires.addShape() can't create a closed wire, therefore
// wireNoResultWires shouldn't have any edges
// It's not possible to get an useful result from wireNoResultWires.isNull() because
// WireJoiner::WireJoinerP::compound is always created by
@@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ TEST_F(WireJoinerTest, Build)
// Assert
// theRange isn't used in WireJoiner::Build() and therefor not attached to any indicator.
// theRange isn't used in WireJoiner::Build() and therefore not attached to any indicator.
// For more reference see
// https://dev.opencascade.org/doc/occt-7.6.0/refman/html/class_message___progress_range.html
// and
@@ -878,7 +878,7 @@ TEST_F(WireJoinerTest, Generated)
// Assert
// There aren't calls to WireJoiner::WireJoinerP::aHistory->AddGenerated() or similar methods in
// WireJoiner::WireJoinerP, therefor nothing is returned by calling
// WireJoiner::WireJoinerP, therefore nothing is returned by calling
// WireJoiner::WireJoinerP::aHistory->Generated().
// There's a call to WireJoiner::WireJoinerP::aHistory->Merge() that uses the history produced
// by a ShapeFix_Wire object in WireJoiner::WireJoinerP::makeCleanWire() that however looks
@@ -921,11 +921,11 @@ TEST_F(WireJoinerTest, IsDeleted)
EXPECT_FALSE(wjIsDeleted.IsDeleted(edge2));
EXPECT_FALSE(wjIsDeleted.IsDeleted(edge3));
// edge4 is a duplicate of edge3 and therefor deleted
// edge4 is a duplicate of edge3 and therefore deleted
EXPECT_TRUE(wjIsDeleted.IsDeleted(edge4));
// edge5 is smaller that the smallest shape that can be considered with the given value of
// tolerance and therefor deleted
// tolerance and therefore deleted
EXPECT_TRUE(wjIsDeleted.IsDeleted(edge5));
}