From 7d815e78d603dca39ffdd49f22f0f01d3877d5b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Uwe Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 17:54:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] [FEM] Elmer example: remove wrong permittivity - a permittivity of 1 F/m is not physical, also not for testing. In fact overwriting a constant is not good practice for an example --- .../equation_electrostatics_capacitance_two_balls.py | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/Mod/Fem/femexamples/equation_electrostatics_capacitance_two_balls.py b/src/Mod/Fem/femexamples/equation_electrostatics_capacitance_two_balls.py index c2bd1deea7..fc43017ee2 100644 --- a/src/Mod/Fem/femexamples/equation_electrostatics_capacitance_two_balls.py +++ b/src/Mod/Fem/femexamples/equation_electrostatics_capacitance_two_balls.py @@ -151,11 +151,6 @@ def setup(doc=None, solvertype="elmer"): con_elect_pot3.CapacitanceBodyEnabled = True analysis.addObject(con_elect_pot3) - # constant vacuum permittivity - const_vacperm = ObjectsFem.makeConstantVacuumPermittivity(doc, "ConstantVacuumPermittivity") - const_vacperm.VacuumPermittivity = "1 F/m" - analysis.addObject(const_vacperm) - # mesh from .meshes.mesh_capacitance_two_balls_tetra10 import create_nodes, create_elements fem_mesh = Fem.FemMesh()