From 9cd85623f0787513d71e4ce3bb1aaf685734c8be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bernd Hahnebach <bernd@bimstatik.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 23:12:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] FEM: gmsh mesh tools, add some comments

---
 src/Mod/Fem/femmesh/gmshtools.py | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/Mod/Fem/femmesh/gmshtools.py b/src/Mod/Fem/femmesh/gmshtools.py
index d2b3e94ea1..f53a34e4ba 100644
--- a/src/Mod/Fem/femmesh/gmshtools.py
+++ b/src/Mod/Fem/femmesh/gmshtools.py
@@ -761,3 +761,37 @@ class GmshTools():
         del self.temp_file_mesh
 
 ##  @}
+
+
+'''
+# simple example how to use the class GmshTools
+
+import Part, ObjectsFem
+
+doc = App.ActiveDocument
+box_obj = doc.addObject('Part::Box', 'Box')
+doc.recompute()
+
+femmesh_obj = ObjectsFem.makeMeshGmsh(doc, box_obj.Name + '_Mesh')
+femmesh_obj.Part = box_obj
+doc.recompute()
+box_obj.ViewObject.Visibility = False
+
+from femmesh import gmshtools
+gmsh_mesh = gmshtools.GmshTools(femmesh_obj)
+error = gmsh_mesh.create_mesh()
+print(error)
+doc.recompute()
+
+'''
+
+'''
+TODO
+class GmshTools should be splittet in two classes
+one class should only collect the mesh parameter from mesh object and his childs
+a second class only uses the collected parameter,
+writes the input file runs gmsh reads back the unv and returns a FemMesh
+gmsh binary will be collected in the second class
+with this we could mesh without document objects
+create a shape and run meshinging class, get the FemMesh :-)
+'''