[TD]fix #9265 - memory leak in cosmetic features
This commit is contained in:
@@ -55,8 +55,6 @@ PropertyCosmeticEdgeList::~PropertyCosmeticEdgeList()
|
||||
|
||||
void PropertyCosmeticEdgeList::setSize(int newSize)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// for (unsigned int i = newSize; i < _lValueList.size(); i++)
|
||||
// delete _lValueList[i];
|
||||
_lValueList.resize(newSize);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -69,6 +67,7 @@ int PropertyCosmeticEdgeList::getSize() const
|
||||
//_lValueList is not const. so why do we pass a const parameter?
|
||||
void PropertyCosmeticEdgeList::setValue(CosmeticEdge* lValue)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Base::Console().Message("PCEL::setValue() - current values: %d lValue: %s\n", _lValueList.size(), lValue ? "valid" : "null");
|
||||
if (lValue) {
|
||||
aboutToSetValue();
|
||||
_lValueList.resize(1);
|
||||
@@ -79,10 +78,13 @@ void PropertyCosmeticEdgeList::setValue(CosmeticEdge* lValue)
|
||||
|
||||
void PropertyCosmeticEdgeList::setValues(const std::vector<CosmeticEdge*>& lValue)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Base::Console().Message("PCEL::seValues() - in values: %d current values: %d\n", lValue.size(), _lValueList.size());
|
||||
aboutToSetValue();
|
||||
_lValueList.resize(lValue.size());
|
||||
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < lValue.size(); i++)
|
||||
_lValueList[i] = lValue[i];
|
||||
if (!lValue.empty()) {
|
||||
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < lValue.size(); i++)
|
||||
_lValueList[i] = lValue[i];
|
||||
}
|
||||
hasSetValue();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user