Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jonas Bähr
5fa3e021e8 PD: Fix the internal InvoluteGear's root/tip arc directions
The arcs on the tip (around the addendum) and the root (between the
fillets) used to have their bulge in the wrong direction for the internal
gear profile: their center points has been on the outside.
Since this error existed since the very first introcution of the internal
gear I assume this was done by accident: Instead of only the fillets, all
arcs have been inverted when the external profile was copied.
This commit now inverts the tip and root arcs again, to be concentric
with the pitch circle -- same as for the external profile.
2023-02-23 12:49:10 +01:00
Jonas Bähr
4a77843845 PD: Improve InvoluteGear's fillet generatrion
Previously, the fillet started at a fixed value, tailored at 20° pressure
angle, a fillet radius of 0.375 and a dedendum of 1.25. With PR #8184
those values became user-adjustable and thus the assumptions of the
original code are not fullfilled any more. This resulted in significant
artefacts, especially for higher pressure angles or smaller dedendums as
commonly found in splines.

This commit actually calculates the junction between fillet and involute
so that the tangents of the both curves match.
The mathematical approach is described in source code comments.

The change in the fillet calculation also affects compatibility with
files generated by earlier versions of FreeCAD. Those changes are way
below 0.1% per tooth, however the earlier test required absolute equality
down to the micron. This was relaxed and also changed to a relative, per
tooth, tolerance.

There is one particular case where the new algorithm performs slightly
worse, though. That is when the fillet radius is too large to the
dedendum, i.e. resulting in a single arc instead of two fillets, and
effectively cannibalizes some of the clearance. This happens with internal
gears having less than 25 teeth. At about 15 teeth it becomes visible
that the fillet is not 100% tanget any more. However, as such a low
number of teeth is highly unusual for internal gears and the effect,
although noticeable, is minor, the overall benefits of the new algorithm
outweighs the drawbacks. And now with the fillet radius being adjustable
it is easy to fix, too.
The technical reason is that the tangency is calculated correctly, but
the fillet circle is displaced aferwards to avoid an overlap of the two
fillets. For the new fillet position, the tangents do not align any more.
2023-02-13 02:31:28 +01:00
Jonas Bähr
464c512e83 PD: Make involute gear's root fillet radius configurable
The original implementation always took 150% of the addendum/dedendum
difference as fillet radius. For a standard full-depth system this
results in a normalized value 0f 0.375, which is pretty close to the 0.38
definded by the basic ISO rack. However, when using much shorter teeth as
e.g. required for a splined shaft, the fillet becomes way too large.

In addition, I don't understand the approximation to calculate the
distance between the gear's center and the top of the fillet yet. It was
only refactored to allow the custom fillet radii, but it retuns the same
values as the original implementation.
However, with high pressure angles, up to 45° used for splines, this
approximation comes to its limits.
2023-01-22 21:44:03 +01:00
Jonas Bähr
37595da316 PD: Make the involute gear's toogh length configurable
Exposing the addednum and dedendum coefficients as properties allows to
change the tooth length above and below the pitch circle. This makes it
possible to use the profile beyond standard full-depth systems, e.g. for
stub tooths and most importantly: involute splined shafts and hubs.

Gear objets created with earlier versions automatically get the
additional properties on document restore. Its values match the hard-
coded values used in earlier versions.

There is a change when creating *new* internal gear profiles, though:
Previously, an addendum coefficient of 0.6 was used, presumably to reduce
the tip length beyond the base circle in order to avoid a non-involute
edge. This method is one proposal from the "Handbook of Gear Design" by
Gitin M. Maitra, as referenced in the original source code comments.

However, Maitra also states that this reduction of the anual gear's tip
in turn requires an enlagement of the mating gear of 1.25 instead of the
ordinary 1.0. And it is only required for a low numer of teeth and/or the
mating gear being quite large (less than 10 teeth in difference, to avoid
interferences).
Because those additional requirements and conditions have not been
implemented, the previously used values have been incomplete anyway. Thus
I decided to not implemented this special case and use the standard
values of 1.0/1.25 for newly created external and internal gears alike.
Internal gears need special care for other kind of interference anyway
and the newly exposed properties now allow to do so.

There is no entry in the task panel for those advanced properties yet.
2023-01-22 21:44:03 +01:00
Jonas Bähr
647a2356b7 PD: Refactor InvoluteGear's Bezier Approximation
The goal of this refactor is to get rid of gear-specific knowledge from
the implementation and argument list. This is to remove the duplicate
definition of addenddum and dedendum that was hidden there.
2023-01-22 21:44:03 +01:00
luz paz
c726b69d7e PD: remove trailing whitespace 2022-11-10 10:32:04 +01:00
Uwe
0788b2c0a2 [PD] remove unnecessary Python check
we only support Python 3
2022-07-31 05:27:45 +02:00
Chris Hennes
b1789ae7d2 [PD] Fix minor static analysis issues in FCGear
LGTM has identified a number of minor issues with the FCGear Part Design
scripts. This commit addresses each of them, and also corrects two minor
spelling errors in the dialog. None of the errors or their fixes are
expected to result in changes to the functionality of the script.
2021-02-27 18:20:32 +01:00
looooo
84f8644244 py3: part-design: involute-gear 2017-04-27 13:17:51 -03:00
Aglef Kaiser
420e71afbb Involute gear script extended for internal gears 2014-08-08 12:10:38 +02:00
jriegel
587f6b220b add fcgear
http://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=5703
2014-02-16 22:19:55 +01:00