- for fluid material writing the elasticity solver failed with unknown Young Modulus
- fix regression with checking for fluid material. Checking the material of the bodies is not sufficient. One can e.g. have a solid without bodies defined, then it applied to all bodies and there might be a fluid defined for only one body. Checking the body's material would then deliver there is no fluid
- the relaxation factor is crucial for nonlinear systems thus help the user by setting constraints and convenient steps.
Since the property stays a float no update is necessary, existing properties just stay a normal float
- same fix as commit dc851bd8 for flow velocity constraint
- the used selection widget did not highlight the selected faces. This made it very hard to work with when one has an existing document where e.g. 5 faces have a certain velocity and you cannot figure out which ones.
To fix this use another selection widget
* Add Placement::isSame() and expose to Python
* Add Placement::multRight/Placement::multLeft
* Fix PlacementPy::rotate
* Add Rotation::multRight/Rotation::multLeft
* Add a test feature FeatureTestPlacement for uni tests
* Add unit tests
- (a regression to FC 0.20.0), use new settings ("direct" is already the default, iterative solving takes here about 5 times longer, DisplaceMesh must be False)
- for an not yet known reason the result from Elmer are only for eigen analyses a factor 1000 (we send the mesh scaled to Elmer and it seems the eigen solver does not notice this)
Therefore scale these results
- since our mesh is in mm, we must multiply the set factor by 1000 to get the real factor. This applies also for pipelines from CCX results.
Now the factor fits with the factor one can set in the CCX results dialog
- after a simulation was run, the pipelines and its childs are recomputed but its shape coloring is not updated.
- also update XML documentation
- also remove comment in tasks.py for now
- it seems that we will need to scale result values (probably for the Elmer Eigen solver)
This PR adds the framework to do this. It is meant for Elmer but designed versatile.
- on recomputing scalar or warp filters the information about the field was lost.
This is because the validity of an array was tested before it is actually filled
- also fix MSVC warning of using a C++ keyword as variable
- also avoid an unnecessary recompute after Elmer solver was run
- for the case that pipeline with a field is active, then another pipeline that does not display any field, we cannot just return because the pipeline cannot have the color bar range of the prevision pipeline