Previously Subtractive loft would create a shape if there is no base
object. This is because the code is shared with Additive Loft, where
that is the right thing to do. Now we check for this, and return error
if there is nothing to subtract from.
* inside mouseReleaseEvent() check if the mouse has been moved and only if yes emit the dragFinished() signal
* improve error handling in mouseDoubleClickEvent
* in mouseDoubleClickEvent start to edit the view provider
* do not emit dragFinished() signal inside mousePressEvent as nothing has been done. This avoids to create an empty transaction and doesn't touch the document
* inside mouseReleaseEvent() check if the mouse has been moved and only if yes emit the signal
* improve error handling in mouseDoubleClickEvent
* in mouseDoubleClickEvent start to edit the view provider
====================================================================
When the ellipse to be projected and the sketch plane are parallel, the original code
by shermelin provided for a translation of the original ellipse, which would be the best solution
if it weren't because the Sketcher, internally, works under the assumption of a normal vector to the
sketcher plane being (0,0,1). If the original ellipse is parallel to the sketch plane, but the sketch
plane is not the XY plane, the copy and translation would result in a ellipse not in the XY plane of the
Sketcher. Then the sketcher internals will not properly consider its dimensions.
The solution applied here is to default to the general method for non-parallel planes.
It solves:
https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=55284#p477522
========================================================
Users chennes and hyarion made me aware of this covereity issue:
Fixes Coverity: geoit can be end() when dereferenced
https://github.com/FreeCAD/FreeCAD/pull/4429/files#
When analysing the block where the dereferrencing appears, it
appears that it is a left-over that no longer makes sense:
- The algorithm classifies block constraints into those that are
not affected by any other driving constraint and those that are
affected by other driving constraints.
- The offending block deals with internal aligned geometry, thus
per definition has a driving internal alignment constraint, for which
the previous block already set the need of post-analysis.
- No matter what, the geometries, the complex one and the internal one
will have at least the driving internal alignment constraint, so they
cannot become "not affected by any other driving constraint".
- If the geometry had a block constraint on it, it was already added for
post-analysis in the previous block. If it did not have one block constraint,
the fact that it is internal aligned geometry is an irrelevant consideration.
Probably there was a point during development when this made sense, but with
the current post-analysis, it does not appear to make sense anymore. So the
block was removed.
This commit adds a unit test for blocked geometry (new block constraint).
